Cases 31 - 40 of 128
Morningstar v. Aguilera et al
as 3:2022cv00650
Plaintiff:
Lance Morningstar
Defendant:
Alexis Aguilera, Michael Bodeker, Whitney A Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Neal et al
as 3:2022cv00605
Plaintiff:
Donald Woods
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Douglas Wardlow and Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2022cv00313
Defendant:
JARED MYNATT, DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey Ali v. Liebel et al
as 3:2022cv00488
Plaintiff:
Mufti Abdul El-Malik-Bey Ali, Frances L Smith-Bey and F L Smith-Bey
Defendant:
David Liebel, K Conklin, Ismael Aleem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Neal
as 2:2022cv00162
Petitioner:
Jess David Woods
Defendant:
Warden Ron Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Neal
as 3:2022cv00502
Petitioner:
Jess David Woods
Respondent:
Ron Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODS v. VIGO COUNTY JAIL
as 2:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
LARRY JOSEPH WOODS
Defendant:
VIGO COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods-Macon v. Indiana Dept of Correction et al
as 3:2022cv00442
Plaintiff:
Martez Roseman Woods-Macon and Martez Rose
Defendant:
Indiana Dept of Correction, Ron Neal, Nowatski and others
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. RAWLEY
as 1:2022cv00875
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. WOODS, II
Defendant:
M. RAWLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRELL v. WEDDING et al
as 2:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
QUINYATTE J. HARRELL
Defendant:
DAVID WEDDING, WOODS, ZUBAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
