Cases 31 - 40 of 444
Council v. Paris Police Department et al
as 4:2022cv00827
Plaintiff:
Juan Marquis Council
Defendant:
Paris Police Department and Gary Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Davidson et al
as 4:2022cv03252
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
David Davidson, James Young, Tamekia Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Braziel v. Sullivan et al
as 4:2022cv00752
Plaintiff:
Karington Braziel
Defendant:
Detective FNU Sullivan, Detective FNU Anderson and Attorney Daniel Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Reynolds
as 5:2022cv00894
Petitioner:
Paul Young
Respondent:
Mark Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pacheco-Morales v. Young et al
as 4:2022cv00591
Plaintiff:
Hector Pacheco-Morales
Defendant:
Detective FNU Young, Ronald L. Davis, Emma Guzmon-Ramon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Young
as 4:2022cv00535
Plaintiff:
Billy Wayne Wallace
Defendant:
Gary Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Max-George v. Collier et al
as 9:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
Cecil Max-George
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Dr. Lannette Linthicum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paraham v. 6th District Court of Lamar County, TX et al
as 4:2022cv00524
Plaintiff:
Marco Paraham
Defendant:
6th District Court of Lamar County, TX and Gary Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. Young et al
as 4:2022cv00424
Plaintiff:
Colby Bryant Flowers
Defendant:
Gary Yang, The Paris News and Gary Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Wilson et al
as 5:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Amber Wilson, Mike Davidson and James Young, .
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
