Cases 481 - 490 of 120,802
David Anthony Dean v. Unknown
as 5:2024cv00973
Petitioner:
David Anthony Dean
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez-Perez v. Garland et al
as 3:2024cv00839
Petitioner:
Carlos Alberto Perez-Perez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, Ronald L. Davis, Steven C. Stafford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
TerVeer v. Cuevas + the People et al
as 3:2024cv00847
Petitioner:
Justin TerVeer
Respondent:
Cuevas + the People and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Stephan
as 3:2024cv00846
Plaintiff:
Rayon Jones
Defendant:
Summer Stephan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Velasco Perez v. Phillips
as 1:2024cv00554
Petitioner:
Alfonso Velasco Perez
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Bode
as 3:2024cv02630
Plaintiff:
Jeovani Jackson
Defendant:
Justin Hughes Bode and Ricardo Candela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Scott Elsmore v. The State of California
as 5:2024cv00919
Petitioner:
Richard Scott Elsmore
Respondent:
The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marquice Bruce v. Twin Towers County Facility
as 5:2024cv00952
Plaintiff:
Marquice Bruce
Defendant:
Twin Towers County Facility, Leora, Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Richard v. Valencia et al
as 2:2024cv01332
Plaintiff:
Craig Richard
Defendant:
Valencia, Abukalam and Serna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
