Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Pierce v. Neal et al
as 3:2018cv00868
Defendant:
Superintendent Ron Neal, Jane Doe or John Doe, C Dustin and others
Plaintiff:
Mr Ronald J Pierce
Undetermined:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Warden
as 3:2018cv00857
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Ronald J Pierce
Undetermined:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MERCADO v. PARKS et al
as 1:2018cv02860
Plaintiff:
ANGELITO C. MERCADO and ANGELITO MERCADO
Defendant:
SHELTON SGT., CHIPPER PARKS, OFFICER PIERCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. KNIGHT
as 1:2018cv00321
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
KEVIN PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. LaPorte County Jail et al
as 3:2017cv00680
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Carter
Defendant:
LaPorte County Jail, J Wilcher, S Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE, JR. v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv02981
Petitioner:
JAMES PIERCE, JR.
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PIERCE v. KNIGHT
as 1:2017cv02900
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
KEVIN PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GAINES v. CORIZON HEALTH et al
as 2:2016cv00243
Defendant:
CONNIE ALLEN, FINOTE ASFAW, BRYAN BULLER and others
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO GAINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv01146
Defendant:
D. BLACK, KEITH BUTTS, ANNA DOCK and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES J. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Indiana State Prison et al
as 3:2016cv00212
Plaintiff:
James Pierce, Jr
Defendant:
Indiana State Prison , Corizon Prison Medical Services , Sandra Redden, LPN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
