Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Burnett v. Riley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00116
Plaintiff:
Bernies Burnett
Defendant:
Bob Riley, Tim Russell, Henry Mabry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lang v. Keeton et al
as 4:2010cv00251
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Lang
Defendant:
Jason Keeton, Steve Marshall and Tim Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charest v. Riley et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2010cv00051
Plaintiff:
Patrick Joseph Charest
Defendant:
Bob Riley, Tim Russell, Henry Mabry and others
Cause Of Action: O
Marks v. Burke et al
as 4:2010cv00061
Plaintiff:
Keith Lydell Marks
Defendant:
Liles Burke, Steve Marshall, Edward Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Amerson et al
as 1:2009cv02175
Plaintiff:
Terence DeVonta' Jackson
Defendant:
Larry Amerson, Lisa Abernathy, Eric Star and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN et al v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv02000
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY DEMITRI BROWN
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, LAPPIN, R. S. BALLASH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noe v. Transfer Agent No. 1 et al
as 2:2009cv01725
Plaintiff:
Woodburck Noe
Defendant:
Transfer Agent No. 1, Richard Allen, Freddie Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Marshall County et al
as 4:2009cv01165
Plaintiff:
Darius Darnell Chambers
Defendant:
Marshall County, Cheryl Pierce and Tim Jolly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Roden et al
as 5:2009cv00447
Plaintiff:
Dana Joe Bryant
Defendant:
Tyler Roden, Edward Potter, Cullman County and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Boglin v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2009cv00423
Plaintiff:
Vincent Earl Boglin
Defendant:
Gene Mitchell, Nina Shelton and Tim Owens
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
