Cases 41 - 50 of 631
Lapp v. Nye et al
as 1:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Katie F. Lapp
Defendant:
George Nye, Tim Burns, LT. McCabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Barraza
as 1:2023cv00270
Petitioner:
Robert F. Williams
Respondent:
Warden Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO BARKER HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ISSAAC FULWOOD, PATRICIA VINES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STERN v. FRACKVILLE CO OFFICER
as 1:2022cv02006
Plaintiff:
Niejea F. Stern
Defendant:
Frackville Co Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Donnell v. Nicholas et al
as 1:2022cv01762
Plaintiff:
Kelley O'Donnell
Defendant:
Wendy Nicholas, William Frantz, Nicole McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCollum v. Pries et al
as 1:2022cv01710
Plaintiff:
Johnnie McCollum
Defendant:
Michael H.W. Pries, George P. Hartwick, Chad Saylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hymer v. Kross et al
as 3:2022cv01531
Plaintiff:
Charles F. Hymer
Defendant:
Dr. Timothy Kross, Kevin Kollman, Dr. Boland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stern v. Sorber et al
as 1:2022cv01484
Petitioner:
Niejea F. Stern
Respondent:
Jamie Sorber, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Dauphin County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KAETZ v. USA
as 2:2022cv01148
Petitioner:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
HOYE v. DILUCENTE EHAVASIK et al
as 2:2022cv01036
Plaintiff:
NATHAN R. HOYE
Defendant:
JUDGE SUSAN F. DILUCENTE EHAVASIK and ALLEGHENY COURTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
