Cases 41 - 50 of 451
Bates v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
Robert Bates
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Annette Chambers-Smith, Ron Erdos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feaster v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
Terrance J Feaster
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Ronald T. Erdos, Cynthia Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony v. Gray
as 5:2022cv00735
Petitioner:
Charles T Anthony
Respondent:
Warden David W. Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony v. Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2022cv02038
Petitioner:
Charles T Anthony
Respondent:
Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kendrick v. Chamber-Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Mark Kendrick
Defendant:
Annette Chamber-Smith, Ronald T. Erdos, Linnea Mahlman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evick v. Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution
as 1:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Jason T. Evick
Defendant:
Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allah v. Chambers Smith et al
as 2:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
El-Barseem K. Allah
Defendant:
Annette Chambers Smith, Ron Erdos, L. Mahlman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. May et al
as 3:2021cv02247
Plaintiff:
Joseph R Hunter, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Harold May, DWO Mr. Watters, Major Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Branch v. Matia
as 1:2021cv02180
Plaintiff:
Marcus A Branch
Defendant:
David T. Matia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Branch v. Matia
as 1:2021cv02152
Petitioner:
Marcus A Branch
Respondent:
David T Matia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
