Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 668
JAMES v. I.D.O.C. MEDICAL et al
as 1:2023cv01039
Plaintiff: ZECHARIAH B. JAMES
Defendant: I.D.O.C. MEDICAL, MENTAL HEALTH STAFF DEPARTMENT, MEDICAL COMPANY P.C.F. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00558
Petitioner: James B Hampton
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODS v. HURT et al
as 1:2023cv01019
Plaintiff: MICHAEL WOODS
Defendant: B. HURT, BLANTON, BOOKOUT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROCKETT v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00281
Petitioner: WILLIAM B CROCKETT, III
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CROCKETT v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv00934
Petitioner: WILLIAM B CROCKETT, III
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CROCKETT III v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00257
Petitioner: WILLIAM B. CROCKETT III
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McQuay v. Reagle et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00436
Plaintiff: Leonard McQuay, Khalfanimalik Khaldun and Leonard B McQuay
Defendant: Christina Reagle, Liaw, Jackson and others
Not Classified By Court: WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Nelson
as 3:2023cv00442
Plaintiff: Joshua B Johnson
Defendant: Sean Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BIRDEN v. LUNSFORD et al
as 1:2023cv00741
Plaintiff: WESLEY B BIRDEN
Defendant: LUNSFORD, GILBERT and UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROCKETT III v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv00680
Petitioner: WILLIAM B. CROCKETT III
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?