Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Ratcliff v. Rowley et al
as 3:2012cv00326
Defendant:
Renee Baker, James Lester, Rod Lightsey and others
Plaintiff:
Evan Ratcliff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Neven et al
as 2:2009cv01582
Plaintiff:
Vernell Ray Evans
Defendant:
Dwight Neven and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Neven et al
as 2:2009cv01371
Petitioner:
Vernell Ray Evans
Respondent:
Dwight Neven and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. McDaniels et al
as 3:2009cv00319
Plaintiff:
Todd Evans
Defendant:
EK McDaniels and Nevada Dept of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01351
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ratcliff v. McDaniel
as 3:2008cv00449
Petitioner:
Evan Ratcliff
Respondent:
E.K. McDaniel and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Evans et al v. Skolnik et al
as 3:2008cv00353
Plaintiff:
Donald York Evans and John Witherow
Defendant:
Howard Skolnik, Don Helling, William Donat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burriola et al v. Baca et al
as 3:2008cv00149
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Burriola and Marla A. Polson
Defendant:
James Baca, Baker, Robert Bianchi and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Browne v. McDaniel et al
as 3:2007cv00290
Petitioner:
Jason Evan Browne
Respondent:
E. K. McDaniel and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Nevens et al
as 2:2007cv00458
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Evans
Defendant:
Dwight Nevens, Howard Skolnik and Agnes A. Horn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
