Cases 41 - 50 of 1,065
Foust v. Godinez et al
as 3:2023cv03557
Plaintiff:
Carl Foust
Defendant:
Sgt. Godinez, M. Strange and I. Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Perez v. Warden, F.C.I. Mendota
as 1:2023cv00931
Petitioner:
Jose Jesus Tapia Perez
Respondent:
Warden, F.C.I. Mendota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC) Fairchild v. Vang, et al.
as 1:2023cv00917
Plaintiff:
Arabella Fairchild
Defendant:
Vang, P Perez, C Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Consiglio v. Hall et al
as 1:2023cv00871
Plaintiff:
Sam Consiglio
Defendant:
Evette Hall, Tom Faina, Jose Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Perez v. County of Merced et al
as 1:2023cv00864
Plaintiff:
Marisel Perez
Defendant:
County of Merced, Merced County Sheriff Department, Vernon Warnke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Sanchez v. Warden
as 2:2023cv01067
Petitioner:
Mariano Perez Sanchez
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
R v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al
as 4:2023cv02405
Plaintiff:
A R
Defendant:
United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons), Ray J. Garcia, Ross Klinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Davila v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00646
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Davila
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons, Rex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jonatan Perez v. J. Engleman
as 2:2023cv03105
Petitioner:
Jonatan Perez
Respondent:
J. Engleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(PC) Perez v. Aramark et al
as 1:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Marcello Perez
Defendant:
Aramark, County of Madera, Well Parth Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
