Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Valencia v. Monge et al
as 4:2010cv00361
Plaintiff:
Antonio Maybe Valencia
Defendant:
Alexis Monge and Cochise County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valencia v. Ryan
as 4:2009cv00574
Petitioner:
Renie Varela Valencia
Respondent:
Charles Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chavez-Valencia v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv01324
Petitioner:
Roberto Chavez-Valencia
Respondent:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Apodaca Valencia v. Phoenix Police Department et al
as 2:2009cv01061
Plaintiff:
Aaron Apodaca Valencia
Defendant:
Phoenix Police Department, Alfonso Flores, Anthony Barreda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz-Valencia v. USA et al
as 4:2009cv00148
Petitioner:
Luciano Ruiz-Valencia
Respondent:
Keith Hall, United States Attorney General, Bureau of Prison Director and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Mora-Valencia v. USA
as 4:2008cv00339
Petitioner:
Hector Mora-Valencia
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Flores v. USA
as 4:2007cv00584
Petitioner:
Benjamin Valencia Flores
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Valencia v. Schriro et al
as 4:2007cv00546
Petitioner:
Gregory Nidez Valencia, Jr
Respondent:
Dora Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
De Licea v. Crawford et al
as 2:2007cv01820
Petitioner:
Berta Valencia De Licea
Respondent:
Phillip Crawford and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Valencia v. Reyna et al
as 2:2007cv01294
Plaintiff:
Gregory Nidez Valencia, Jr
Defendant:
Reyna, Boggs, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
