Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,096
Butts v. Clarke
as 1:2023cv01396
Petitioner: Corey Lee Butts
Respondent: Harold W Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenneth Duodu v. Chadwick Dotson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-7009
Petitioner / Appellant: KENNETH OTENG DUODU
Respondent / Appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE and CHADWICK DOTSON
Askari Lumumba v. Chadwick Dotson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-7011
Plaintiff / Appellant: ASKARI DANSO MS LUMUMBA
Defendant / Appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE, JOSEPH WALTERS, DAVID ANDERSON and others
Wilson v. Clarke
as 2:2023cv00506
Petitioner: Christopher E. Wilson
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shebri Dillon v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6995
Petitioner / Appellant: SHEBRI STACY DILLON
Respondent / Appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE, VDOC
Hawley v. Clarke
as 2:2023cv00498
Petitioner: Garry Hawley
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Karl Depuy v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6984
Petitioner / Appellant: KARL HEINZ DEPUY
Respondent / Appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Department of Corrections and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of the Department of Corrections
Forster v. Krasnoff et al
as 1:2023cv01361
Plaintiff: Tommie Forster and Tommie Matthias El
Defendant: Alan P. Krasnoff, Clint D. Davis, Harold W. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Thomas Simpson v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6980
Petitioner / Appellant: THOMAS BARTHOLOMEW SIMPSON
Respondent / Appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE and CHADWICK DOTSON
Arthur Sanford v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6964
Petitioner / Appellant: ARTHUR LEE SANFORD
Respondent / Appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Dir.; Virginia DOC, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia DOC and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia DOC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?