Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Early et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2016cv00031
Plaintiff:
Keith Early and Tammy Early
Defendant:
Arizona, State of , Charles L Ryan , Unknown Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bonds v. United States Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration et al
as 2:2015cv02551
Plaintiff:
Darryl James Bonds
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration, Jeanne Garcia, Edward Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02559
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orozco #260141 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv02026
Plaintiff:
Luis Felipe Orozco
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon Health Incorporated, Michael Hegmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Phoenix Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv02016
Plaintiff:
Larry L Moore
Defendant:
Phoenix Police Department, Hilton Hotel Administration and Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Phoenix Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv01979
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Moore
Defendant:
Phoenix Police Department, Hilton Hotel Administration, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman # 229191 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01302
Plaintiff:
James Ward Chapman, III
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon Health Incorporated, Michael Hegmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Patino #134104 v. Arizona Department of Administration
as 2:2013cv01367
Plaintiff:
Ramon Patino, Jr.
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
