Cases 41 - 50 of 408
Dunn v. Oliver et al
as 4:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
Bryan Andrew Dunn
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Warden Pinero, Lieutenant Kaplin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Satcher v. McFarlane
as 3:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
D'Andre Satcher
Defendant:
Andrew McFarlane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Cobb County Adult Detention Facility
as 1:2023cv04998
Plaintiff:
Andrew T. Murphy
Defendant:
Cobb County Adult Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daddario v. Fuller et al
as 1:2023cv04950
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Daddario
Defendant:
C Andrew Fuller, Kathlene Gosselin, Roberta McCormac and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bergeron v. Unknown Public Defender
as 1:2023cv04802
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Defendant:
Unknown Public Defender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ivey v. Langley
as 3:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
William Andrew Ivey
Defendant:
Terry Langley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Wilcox et al
as 3:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Ramirez Brandon Lee and Brandon Lee Ramirez
Defendant:
DW Mr. Wilcox, DW Ms. Stewart, Warden Andrew McFarlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. McFarland
as 4:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Reginald Miller
Defendant:
Andrew McFarland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCGILL v. COLEMAN et al
as 5:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY ANDREW MCGILL
Defendant:
CHARLES COLEMAN, CESAR SISKA and DOCTOR CESAR SISKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITTLE v. REEVES et al
as 5:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ANDREW WHITTLE
Defendant:
Deputy Warden REEVES, CAPTAIN SALDANA, CERT OFFICER PAUL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
