Cases 41 - 50 of 729
Snell v. Siddiq et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00730
Plaintiff:
Jason Allen Snell
Defendant:
Tahir Siddiq, Jeffrey Sanders, M. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsey v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00490
Plaintiff:
Dennis Allen Lindsey, Jr.
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Charles Daniels, Arnaldo Mercado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)(MEMBER)
as 3:2021cv00552
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Petty
Defendant:
Heath Taylor, Wayne Johnson, Sergeant Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)(MEMBER)
as 3:2021cv00511
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Petty
Defendant:
Russell County Jail, Heath Taylor, Wayne Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. Russell County et al (INMATE 1)(MEMBER)
as 3:2021cv00522
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Petty
Defendant:
Russell County, Sergeant Hood, Corp. Shay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. Stanley et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2021cv00464
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Petty
Defendant:
Justin Stanley, Sargent Thompson and Officer Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lingerfelt v. Toney et al
as 5:2021cv00647
Petitioner:
John Allen Lingerfelt
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Alabama Department of Corrections, Deborah Toney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dotson v. Craig et al
as 5:2021cv00592
Defendant:
Sheriff Max Sanders, Judge Craig, Capt. Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Greg Allen Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Malone et al
as 4:2021cv00386
Defendant:
Captain Carla Graham, Captain Gray Malone and Captain Ronald England
Plaintiff:
Seth Allen Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schofield v. Givens et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00173
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Givens and Steven T. Marshall
Plaintiff:
Allen Wayne Schofield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
