Cases 41 - 50 of 69
ARMSTRONG v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv02822
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and PPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARMSTRONG v. WINSTEAD et al
as 2:2012cv02367
Petitioner:
ALICIA ARMSTRONG
Respondent:
RHODA WINSTEAD, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv02030
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ARMSTRONG
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RICHARDSON v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2012cv00087
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO, PAUL WALKER, S. P. DURCO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARMSTRONG v. USA
as 1:2011cv00285
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
MARJORIE DIEHL ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ARMSTRONG v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2011cv01074
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
BRIAN COLEMAN, DORINA VARNER, C. J. BITTNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2011cv01046
Plaintiff:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Defendant:
LOUIS S. FOLINO, BYUNGHAK JIN, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARMSTRONG v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2011cv04354
Petitioner:
KAREEM ARMSTRONG
Respondent:
BRIAN V. COLEMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PITTMAN v. GLUNT
as 3:2011cv00148
Plaintiff:
TERRACE A. PITTMAN
Defendant:
STEVEN GLUNT, DEBBIE YOUNKIN, JANET PEARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUPP v. ARMSTRONG COUNTY D.A. et al
as 2:2011cv00772
Petitioner:
SAMUEL M. RUPP
Respondent:
ARMSTRONG COUNTY D.A. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
