Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Messina v. Lawson et al
as 2:2013cv00324
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Messina
Defendant:
Ronnie Lawson, Tony Allen and Autumn Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Carter County Jail et al
as 2:2013cv00228
Plaintiff:
Rodney Lee Armstrong, Jr
Defendant:
Carter County Jail, Tom Smith and Carter County Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Hawkins County, TN et al (TVR)
as 2:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
Mark Coleman
Defendant:
Hawkins County, TN, Ronnie Lawson, Tony Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. The City of Memphis et al
as 2:2013cv02082
Defendant:
The City of Memphis, Memphis Police Department, Sgt. Goods and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice D. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bordages v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2013cv02042
Plaintiff:
James Harry Hebert Bordages, Jr.
Defendant:
Armstrong, Bill Oldham, Mia Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grooms v. Hawkins County, TN et al
as 2:2012cv00473
Plaintiff:
James W Grooms, Jr
Defendant:
Hawkins County, TN, - Hutson, Ronnie Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv02980
Movant:
Antonia Armstrong
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Baggett v. Montgomery County Jail et al
as 3:2012cv00952
Plaintiff:
Joseph William Baggett
Defendant:
D. Armstrong, (f/n/u) Seacrest and (f/n/u) Teamer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Sullivan County Jail
as 2:2012cv00278
Plaintiff:
Jacob W Armstrong
Defendant:
Sullivan County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Sullivan County Jail
as 3:2012cv00323
Plaintiff:
Jacob W Armstrong
Defendant:
Sullivan County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
