Cases 41 - 50 of 1,182
JOHNSON v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv03811
Plaintiff:
CASSANDRA JOHNSON
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS doing business as SCI-DALLAS, KEVIN RANSON, JASON BOHINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PARKER v. TICE, et al
as 2:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN PARKER
Defendant:
E. TICE, M. HOUSER, M. PYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGILL v. WARDEN HUTCHINSON
as 1:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
KEITH B. MCGILL
Defendant:
WARDEN HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Zborovancik et al
as 3:2023cv00248
Petitioner:
Andy Ortiz
Respondent:
BM. Zborovancik, LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, DAN CARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Salamon et al
as 4:2023cv01626
Plaintiff:
Jerome Washington
Defendant:
B. Salamon, Lieutenant Butler, John Doe(s) 1-8 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Zborovancik et al
as 3:2023cv01345
Plaintiff:
Andy Ortiz
Defendant:
BM. Zborovancik, John Doe, Dan Caro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGHSTON v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2023cv03354
Petitioner:
KENJAH HUGHSTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES, WARDEN MCGEE and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hinton v. Salamon et al
as 1:2023cv01686
Plaintiff:
Kaleel Hinton
Defendant:
B. Salamon, Mr. Gourley, Mr. Dickie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAYBOY v. KULLNER et al
as 2:2023cv03658
Plaintiff:
RODRICK MAURICE BRAYBOY
Defendant:
KULLNER, ZACHARY J. MOSLACK, DAYNORWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drayton v. McIntyre et al
as 1:2023cv01308
Plaintiff:
Kapri Drayton
Defendant:
Amanda McIntyre, D. Horan, LT. Barrat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
