Cases 41 - 50 of 143
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, the et al
as 0:2012cv02990
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, the, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the, Corrections Medical Services and others
Banks v. Jesson et al
as 0:2012cv02901
Plaintiff:
Eugene Christopher Banks
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Dennis Benson, Kevin Moser and others
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, the et al
as 0:2012cv01554
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, the, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the, Lucinda Jesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Runningshield v. Minnesota, State of et al
as 0:2012cv01467
Plaintiff:
Matt Runningshield
Defendant:
Minnesota, State of, Tom Roy, Joan Fabian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Jesson et al
as 0:2012cv01410
Plaintiff:
Michael Pittman
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Cal Ludeman, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Folson v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv01137
Plaintiff:
Al Folson
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Govenor Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wickner v. Dayton et al
as 0:2012cv01101
Plaintiff:
Lance Wickner
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Lucinda Jesson, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eberhardt v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00942
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bruce Eberhardt
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Dayton et al
as 0:2012cv00881
Plaintiff:
Dale Allen Williams, Sr.
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Lori Swanson, Cal Ludeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2012cv00784
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Johnson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections, Minnesota Correctional Facility Stillwater, Michelle Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
