Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Rochester v. Harcuff et al
as 8:2011cv02340
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
C Harcuff, Attwood, Root and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Bull Street Hospital et al
as 8:2011cv02180
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
Bull Street State Hospital, State of South Carolina, Seneca, Town of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. South Carolina Dept of Corr et al
as 0:2011cv01455
Plaintiff:
Curtis L King
Defendant:
South Carolina Dept of Corr, Jon Ozmit, Warden Cartledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Black v. Knowlin et al
as 4:2010cv00958
Plaintiff:
Eric Black
Defendant:
Knowlin, Bradshaw, Kenneth Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Littlejohn v. State of South Carolina et al
as 6:2010cv00745
Plaintiff:
Quintin M Littlejohn
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, United States of America and Mary Black Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Scipio v. Black Cat Bail Bonds et al
as 3:2010cv00311
Plaintiff:
Adam Scipio
Defendant:
Black Cat Bail Bonds, Amy Webber, Steve Kindel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Black v. Crosby et al
as 2:2009cv02594
Petitioner:
Barney Ray Black
Respondent:
Jeff Crosby and Isaac McDuffie Stone, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keith v. Morton et al
as 0:2009cv01201
Plaintiff:
Trovon Aquarius Keith
Defendant:
Penny Morton, Amanda Boswell Gowans, Dawn R Hampton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Damballah v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv03674
Plaintiff:
Shango Damballah
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Jon E Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Black v. USA
as 9:2008cv70112
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Miranda T Black
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
