Cases 41 - 50 of 55
William Rawls v. PA Dept Corr, et al
as 09-1583
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM RAWLS
Defendant - Appellee:
PA DEPT CORR, BD PROBATION PAROLE, JEFFREY BEARD and others
Farmer v. McVey, et al.
as 4:2009cv00166
Plaintiff:
Joseph W. Farmer
Defendant:
Catherine C. McVey, Walter M. Phillips, Jeffrey A. Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Bohonyi v. Catherine McVey, et al
as 08-4112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN MICHAEL BOHONYI
Defendant:
CATHERINE C. MCVEY, CHAIRMAN, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PAROLE, DA DELAWARE and ATTY GEN PA
Robert Dorsey v. Catherine McVey
as 08-3448
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DORSEY
Defendant:
CATHERINE C. MCVEY, Chairman
NIEVES v. MCVEY et al
as 2:2008cv03736
Plaintiff:
SERAFIN NIEVES
Defendant:
CATHERINE C. MCVEY, LAWRENCE F. MURRAY, RACHAEL SPRINGER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NIEVES v. PENSYLVANIN BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2008cv03735
Plaintiff:
SERAFIN NIEVES
Defendant:
PENSYLVANIN BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, CATHERINE C. MCVEY, RACHEL SPRINGER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dorsey v. McVey
as 3:2008cv01280
Petitioner:
Robert Dorsey
Respondent:
Catherine C. McVey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bricker v. McVey et al
as 1:2008cv01033
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Bricker
Defendant:
Catherine C. McVey, Michael L. Green, Jeffrey R. Imboden and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ronald Williams v. Sharon Sebek, et al
as 08-2307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD A. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
BEN E. ANSELL, JEFFREY BEARD, DANIEL BURNS and others
NICKENS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2007cv01908
Petitioner:
THEODORE M. NICKENS
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ANTHONY A. WILLIAMS, CATHERINE C. MCVEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
