Cases 41 - 50 of 121
Rasheed v. D'Antonio et al
as 1:2010cv11253
Plaintiff:
Rashad Rasheed
Defendant:
Angela D'Antonio, Marlene Dodge, Dyana Nicki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shedlock v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
as 1:2010cv11249
Plaintiff:
Paul F. Shedlock
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Correction, Harold W. Clarke, Michael Corsini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford et al v. Clarke et al
as 1:2010cv11202
Plaintiff:
Albert Ford, Joel Vasquez, Carlos Irizarry and others
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Veronica Madden, Paul Diapalo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valerio v. Clarke
as 1:2010cv10567
Petitioner:
Ramon Valerio
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crowell v. Clarke
as 1:2010cv10502
Petitioner:
Richard Crowell
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ford et al v. Hallett
as 1:2010cv10471
Plaintiff:
Albert Ford, Harold Clarke and David Malone
Defendant:
Allison Hallett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cloutman v. Clarke et al
as 1:2009cv11375
Plaintiff:
Michael Cloutman
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Marlene Dodge, Dyana Nicki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davila v. Clarke
as 1:2010cv10267
Petitioner:
Victor Davila
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tilson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2010cv10278
Petitioner:
Harold Tilson, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pereira v. Clarke et al
as 1:2010cv10238
Plaintiff:
Scott Pereira
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Allison Hallet, Christopher LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
