Cases 41 - 50 of 125
OCASIO-SANTANA v. MOONEY et al
as 5:2017cv03168
Petitioner:
LUIS MANUEAL OCASIO-SANTANA
Respondent:
MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REYES v. GILMORE et al
as 5:2017cv01992
Plaintiff:
ERVIN REYES
Respondent:
ROBERT GILMORE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REYES v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2017cv00300
Petitioner:
ERVIN REYES
Respondent:
ROBERT GILMORE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BURKHARDT v. DELBALSO et al
as 5:2017cv00024
Petitioner:
GEORGE BURKHARDT
Respondent:
THERESA DELBALSO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
YOUNG v. CLARK et al
as 5:2016cv06406
Petitioner:
WILLIE MACK YOUNG
Respondent:
MICHAEL CLARK, THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER COUNTY and TEH ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SEABURY v. LINK et al
as 5:2016cv06326
Petitioner:
MICHAEL SEABURY
Respondent:
CYNTHIA LINK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STICKILY v. COUNTY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2016cv06252
Plaintiff:
WALT STICKILY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LANCASTER , DENNIS MOLYNEAUX, PAUL SMEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GALARZA-RUIZ v. SMITH et al
as 5:2016cv05769
Petitioner:
ARIESET GALARZA-RUIZ
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stickley v. County of Lancaster et al
as 1:2016cv02193
Plaintiff:
Walt Stickily
Defendant:
County of Lancaster , Dennis Molyneaux, Paul Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAJOR v. SUPERINTENDENT: CLERK et al
as 5:2016cv05106
Petitioner:
EDWARD L. MAJOR
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT: CLERK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
