Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Campbell v. Wallace
as 4:2013cv01445
Petitioner:
Maurice Campbell
Respondent:
Ian Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. City of Park Hills Police Department et al
as 4:2013cv01152
Plaintiff:
Vance Roy Clark
Defendant:
City of Park Hills Police Department, City of Park Hills, Mike Kurtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Conlee
as 4:2013cv00064
Petitioner:
Harry G Campbell, III
Respondent:
kenneth Conlee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. United States of America
as 4:2012cv02253
Petitioner:
Cole Campbell
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Campbell v. Pittman et al
as 4:2012cv01237
Plaintiff:
Harry G Campbell, III
Defendant:
Terry Pittman, Henry Osuagwu, Sheldon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newlon v. Still Regional Medical Center et al
as 4:2012cv01303
Plaintiff:
Ronald Newlon
Defendant:
Still Regional Medical Center, Gary Campbell, Unknown Scherr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitehead v. Lombardi et al
as 2:2012cv04184
Plaintiff:
David Levi Whitehead
Defendant:
George A Lombardi, Missouri Department of Corrections, Matt Sturm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Farnham et al
as 5:2012cv06060
Plaintiff:
Terry Mason Turner
Defendant:
Milo Farnham, Phillip Dean, David Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Mitchem et al
as 1:2012cv00101
Plaintiff:
Maurice Campbell
Defendant:
Tracey Mitchem, Paula Phillips, William Stange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Campbell et al
as 2:2012cv00026
Plaintiff:
Leroy Walker
Defendant:
Gary Campbell, T. Bredeman, Unknown Buyum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
