Cases 41 - 50 of 396
Smith v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Smith
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Jefferson S. Dunn, Quentin D. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toney v. Autauga County Metro Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Kenneth John Toney
Defendant:
Autauga County Metro Jail and Captain Nixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ollison v. Boyd et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Ledarrius Jabrell Ollison
Defendant:
Kendrick Boyd, Captain Jenkins, Dranarris Lovejoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. Lt. Marvin et al
as 1:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Julius A. Hines
Defendant:
Lt. Marvin, Lt. Banks, Captain Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McConico v. Cook et al
as 1:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
James McConico, Jr.
Defendant:
Mary Cook, Kay Ivey, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Fountain Correctional Facility
as 1:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Rashad Lee
Defendant:
Fountain Correctional Facility, Antonio McClain and Captain McNeal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Santa Maria et al
as 4:2021cv01698
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mitchell
Defendant:
Seargent Santa Maria and Captain Malone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharifi v. Dunn et al
as 1:2021cv00552
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Sharifi
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Terry Raybon, Katrina Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobbs v. Lee
as 5:2021cv01577
Plaintiff:
Darwin V Hobbs, Jr
Defendant:
Captain Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCrary v. Braxton et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00779
Plaintiff:
Frankie McCrary
Defendant:
Alfredia Braxton and Captain Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
