Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Dubois v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2013cv00115
Petitioner:
David R. Dubois
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island , A. T. Wall and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Letourneau v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00848
Plaintiff:
Devon Letourneau
Defendant:
Rhode Island Department of Corrections, A. T. Wall, Warden McCauley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Clark et al
as 1:2012cv00788
Plaintiff:
Juan C. Martinez
Defendant:
Clark, Department of Corrections, James Vierra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. State of RI et al
as 1:2011cv00637
Plaintiff:
Danny L. Brown
Defendant:
State of RI, Lincoln Chafee, AT Wall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chase v. Chafee et al
as 1:2011cv00586
Plaintiff:
Parrish Chase
Defendant:
Lincoln Chafee, David Fathi, Alvin J. Bronstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
English v. Wall et al
as 1:2011cv00378
Petitioner:
Michael English
Respondent:
A. T. Wall, Rhode Island Department of Corrections and State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martinez v. Begones et al
as 1:2011cv00071
Plaintiff:
Juan C. Martinez
Defendant:
C.O. Begones, John J. Moran and RI Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections
as 1:2009cv00433
Petitioner:
Harold Parker
Defendant:
Rhode Island Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Wall et al
as 1:2009cv00169
Plaintiff:
Jason Cook
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall , Stephen Boyd , Michele Auger and others
Cause Of Action: O
Erdman v. Carcieri et al
as 1:2008cv00320
Petitioner:
Fred Erdman
Respondent:
Donald Carcieri, A. T. Wall, R.I. Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
