Cases 41 - 50 of 72
GOOLSBY v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2016cv00330
Plaintiff:
DERONTAY GLENNZELL GOOLSBY
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, DON BLAKELY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. OWENS et al
as 5:2016cv00122
Plaintiff:
DONALD FRANK SMITH, JR
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, RICKY MYRICK, SHEVONDAH FIELDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roderick McKissick v. Governor of Georgia, et al
as 16-10102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODERICK MCKISSICK
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF GEORGIA, COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MACON SP WARDEN and others
NOLLEY v. BRYSON et al
as 5:2016cv00005
Plaintiff:
DARNELL NOLLEY
Defendant:
HOMER BRYSON, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, RICKY MYRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MADDEN v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 3:2015cv00124
Plaintiff:
ERNEST O MADDEN, III
Defendant:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, DON BLAKELY, MISTIE JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv04492
Plaintiff:
Donald Frank Smith
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Brian Owens, Ricky Myrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKISSICK v. DEAL et al
as 5:2015cv00407
Plaintiff:
RODERICK MCKISSICK
Defendant:
NATHAN DEAL, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUKES v. BLAKELY et al
as 5:2015cv00260
Plaintiff:
WILLIE ALVIN DUKES
Defendant:
DON BLAKELY, DEMUNDO, TAKENYA JORDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2015cv00231
Plaintiff:
RONNIE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, TRACEY MCINTYRE, HENDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. OWENS et al
as 5:2015cv00202
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN CLARK
Defendant:
DENNIS BROWN, ERIC SELLERS, GEORGE IVEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
