Cases 41 - 50 of 1,306
Redmond v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority et al
as 7:2023cv00712
Plaintiff:
Mark David Redmond, Sr.
Defendant:
Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority, Major Chad Kilgore and Captain Patricia McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monzon v. Spencer et al
as 3:2023cv00693
Plaintiff:
Roman Sebastian Monzon
Defendant:
Harvey Spencer, Shaw, Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhyne v. Aikens
as 3:2023cv00691
Plaintiff:
David Rhyne
Defendant:
Lieutenant Aikens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Commonwealth of Virginia, et al,
as 7:2023cv00699
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Anderson
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Washington County Sheriff's Office, Detective Roop Brad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stepansky v. Lane et al
as 7:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Megan Stepansky
Defendant:
Jimmy Lane, David Boone, Sharon Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estes v. Greenrock Correctional Center et al
as 7:2023cv00693
Plaintiff:
Bruce A. Estes
Defendant:
Greenrock Correctional Center, Chadwick Dotson, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Leu
as 2:2023cv00525
Petitioner:
Richard Allen Patterson
Respondent:
David Leu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harris v. Leu
as 2:2023cv00526
Petitioner:
Derrick Lamont Harris
Respondent:
David Leu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Miller v. USA
as 1:2023cv01434
Petitioner:
David Harris Miller
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Monzon v. Robinson et al
as 1:2023cv01428
Plaintiff:
Roman Sebastian Monzon
Defendant:
A. David Robinson, Jermiah Fitz, Jr., Melissa Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
