Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Rognirhar v. Kinlund et al
as 8:2008cv00089
Plaintiff:
Strider Rognirhar
Defendant:
Kurt Kinlund, Richard Cruickshank, Dennis Bakewell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martin v. Bakewell et al
as 8:2008cv00117
Petitioner:
Clenix Martin
Respondent:
Dennis Bakewell, Nebraska State Penitentiary and Robert P. Houston
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Bakewell
as 8:2008cv00046
Petitioner:
Isaac D. Brown
Respondent:
Dennis Bakewell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Billy Tyler v. George Green, et al
as 07-3906
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Billy Roy Tyler
Defendant - Appellee:
George Green, legal counsel 4 Nebraska Department of Correction (NDCS), Randy Crosby, Unknown Krantz, ?, Investigator 4 Nebraska State Patrol and others
Hymond v. Bakewell et al
as 8:2007cv00438
Petitioner:
David Hymond
Respondent:
Robert Houston and Dennis Bakewell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fountain v. Bakewell
as 8:2007cv00353
Petitioner:
Marcus E. Fountain
Respondent:
Dennis Bakewell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz v. Bakewell
as 4:2007cv03211
Petitioner:
Gary E. Ortiz
Respondent:
Dennis Bakewell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Engler v. Bakewell
as 4:2007cv03204
Petitioner:
Peter John Engler
Respondent:
Dennis Bakewell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stainbrook v. Houston et al
as 4:2007cv03196
Plaintiff:
Curtis Stainbrook
Defendant:
Robert Houston, Frank Hopkins, Dennis Bakewell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Bakewell
as 4:2007cv03125
Petitioner:
DeRoise J. Washington
Respondent:
Dennis Bakewell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
