Cases 41 - 50 of 138
Glover v. Bryson
as 1:2020cv01836
Defendant:
Dept. Saltenburger, Noel Kercey, Dept. Packer and others
Plaintiff:
Larry R. Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olinger v. Douglas County Jail et al
as 6:2020cv01450
Defendant:
Doctor Blum, Correct Care Solutions, Douglas County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Brandyn James Charles Olinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Brown et al
as 6:2020cv01416
Plaintiff:
Tariq Muhammad
Defendant:
OSP Supt. Brandon Kelly, Dir. Colette Peters, Gov. Kate Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eaton v. Eynon et al
as 2:2020cv01251
Defendant:
Eynon, Oregon Dept. of Corrections, Stark and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Dale Eaton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byers v. Stark et al
as 2:2020cv01247
Plaintiff:
Robert Jerome Byers
Defendant:
Lt. Bauer, Oregon Dept. of Corrections, T. Blewett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huerta v. Or. Dept. of Corrections
as 3:2020cv01069
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lynn Huerta
Defendant:
Or. Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Josephine County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 1:2020cv01006
Defendant:
Josephine County District Attorney, Josephine County Community Corrections, Josephine County Sheriff's Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Samuel Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Oregon Dept. of Corrections et al
as 6:2020cv00967
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Whitney, Oregon Dept. of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Tariq Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wicks et al v. Grove et al
as 3:2020cv00812
Defendant:
Columbia County Sheriffs Dept., Judge Ted Grove, Jeffery Auxier and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Wicks, Sr. and Norman Wicks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byers v. Vester et al
as 2:2020cv00813
Plaintiff:
Robert Jerome Byers
Defendant:
Oregon Dept. of Corrections, Matthew Vester and Lezlee Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
