Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Ruff v. State of Alabama, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00410
Plaintiff:
Michael Daniel Ruff
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Charles Price, Eleanor I. Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Alabama Dept. of Corretions, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00335
Plaintiff:
Willie Kevin Williams
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Carolyn Golson, Mark Bruton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughley v. Strange et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2012cv00028
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hughley
Defendant:
Luther Strange, Alabama Public Safety Director and Jay Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Thomas et al
as 6:2011cv04036
Plaintiff:
James Dennison White
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Brandon Kinard, Department of Corrections Medical Services Director and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Talley et al
as 4:2011cv02813
Plaintiff:
Victor Allen Thomas
Defendant:
Talley, Oath, CMS Director and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00483
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lewis Price
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Richard F. Allen, Willie Rowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shakur v. Johnson et al
as 1:2011cv00220
Defendant:
Carl Johnson, Warden Hetzel, Deputy Warden Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Jah'Gambia Omara Shakur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Bentley et al
as 5:2011cv01322
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lewis Price
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Richard E Allen, Willie Rowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoops v. Correctional Medical Services et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2010cv01023
Plaintiff:
Charles Dwight Hoops
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services and Director of Nurses
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Medical Director at Hamilton Prison
as 6:2010cv02498
Plaintiff:
George J Thomas
Defendant:
Medical Director at Hamilton Prison
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
