Cases 41 - 50 of 59
HOEVER v. CREWS, et al
as 4:2013cv00073
Plaintiff:
CONRAAD L HOEVER
Defendant:
MICHAEL CREWS, R HOSFORD, E WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Frink et al
as 9:2012cv00166
Petitioner:
Rodney E. Watson
Respondent:
Martin Frink and State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LLOYD v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2012cv00367
Plaintiff:
GARY STEVEN LLOYD
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, S HOSFORD, E WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Godinez et al
as 3:2012cv00308
Plaintiff:
Jerome E Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
S A Godinez, Marc Hodges, Chaplain Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson, Jr. v. Godinez et al
as 3:2012cv00294
Plaintiff:
Jerome E. Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
S A Godinez, Marc Hodges, Chaplain Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson, Jr. v. Godinaz et al
as 3:2012cv00240
Plaintiff:
Jerome E. Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
S.A. Godinaz, Marc Hodges, Chaplain Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Godinez et al
as 3:2012cv00238
Plaintiff:
Jerome E Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
S A Godinez, Marc Hodges, C/O Kessell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerome Watson, Jr. v. Lisa Madigan, et al
as 11-2981
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME E. WATSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LISA MADIGAN, ANITA ALVAREZ, JODY P. WEIS and others
Watson v. Cook County State's Attorney Office et al
as 1:2011cv04194
Petitioner:
Jerome E. Watson, Jr.
Respondent:
Cook County State's Attorney Office and Attorney General Of The State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Medaris v. Wynne Unit Law Library
as 4:2011cv02456
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Medaris
Defendant:
Wynne Unit Law Library, Gregory M. Vaughn, Vernon K. Pittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
