Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Minnesota
Cases 41 - 50 of 92
Gorgol v. Minnesota, State of We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2017cv00040
Petitioner: Charles Edward Gorgol
Respondent: Minnesota, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Willis v. USA
as 0:2016cv04083
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Michael Edward Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lovejoy v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2016cv02468
Plaintiff: David Josef Lovejoy
Defendant: Minnesota Department of Human Services , Minnesota Sex Offender Program , Edward Kesty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braziel v. Roy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2015cv03448
Plaintiff: Levi Braziel, Jr
Defendant: Tom Roy, Eddie Miles, Becky Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greer v. Wilson
as 0:2015cv03094
Petitioner: James Edward Greer
Respondent: Denise Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cheatam v. Bureau of Prisons, Duluth
as 0:2015cv01210
Petitioner: Edward Allen Cheatam
Respondent: Bureau of Prisons, Duluth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bergren v. Minnesota Department of Corrections, The, et al
as 0:2014cv04658
Plaintiff: Edward Ross Bergren
Defendant: Minnesota Department of Corrections, The, Tom Roy, Nan Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milner v. Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2014cv04461
Petitioner: Edward Leroy Milner
Respondent: Michelle Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Milner v. Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2014cv04243
Petitioner: Edward Leroy Milner
Respondent: Michelle Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Derden v. USA
as 0:2014cv03235
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Demetrius Charles Edward Derden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?