Cases 41 - 50 of 57
ALLEN v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2018cv03656
Defendant:
LEFLORE, JOHNSON, INDIANA POLITICAL SUBDIVISION RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ALVIN ALLEN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. EMERSON
as 1:2018cv02731
Respondent:
DONALD EMERSON
Petitioner:
JUSTIN TYLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOLLINGSWORTH v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2018cv02645
Respondent:
DONALD EMERSON and CURTIS T. HILL
Petitioner:
LEON HOLLINGSWORTH, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MONDAY v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv02387
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DONALD EMERSON, HERITAGE TRAILS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID EUGENE MONDAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIXON v. EMERSON
as 1:2018cv00912
Petitioner:
DAVID J. DIXON
Respondent:
EMERSON
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DIXON v. EMERSON
as 1:2018cv00910
Petitioner:
DAVID J. DIXON
Respondent:
EMERSON
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DIXON v. EMERSON
as 1:2018cv00913
Petitioner:
DAVID J. DIXON
Respondent:
EMERSON
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KEEYLEN v. OLBERHOLTZER et al
as 1:2018cv00791
Respondent:
EMERSON, WENDY KNIGHT and OLBERHOLTZER
Petitioner:
DAVON KEEYLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. WEXFORD HEALTH MEDICAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2018cv00102
Defendant:
SARGEANT BENNETT, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JANE DOE and others
Plaintiff:
MARTAZZ WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. EMERSON
as 1:2017cv03746
Respondent:
D. EMERSON
Petitioner:
MARTAZZ WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
