Cases 41 - 50 of 69
FIELDS v. SUPERINTENDENT OF PENNSYLVANIA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AT MUNCY PA et al
as 2:2012cv00431
Petitioner:
TEQUILLA FIELDS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OF PENNSYLVANIA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AT MUNCY PA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fields v. Bledsoe
as 1:2012cv00427
Petitioner:
Thomas Abdul Fields
Respondent:
B.A. Bledsoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Habulembe v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 3:2012cv00335
Petitioner:
Chuundu Mooba Habulembe
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General , U.S. Secretary of DHS , I.C.E. Field Office Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FIELDS v. THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2011cv05089
Plaintiff:
VERNON DONNELL FIELDS
Defendant:
THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELCH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv04670
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WELCH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRESBURY v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2011cv03701
Plaintiff:
ALAN PRESBURY
Defendant:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, JAY LANE, ETTA G. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIELDS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2011cv00076
Petitioner:
NAFICE FIELDS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tepong v. Murphy et al
as 3:2010cv02656
Plaintiff:
Lor Tepong
Defendant:
Michael P Murphy, S.A. Nezezon, D Cadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WROTEN v. SUPREME COURT FOR PENNA. et al
as 2:2010cv05744
Petitioner:
RODNEY WROTEN
Respondent:
SUPREME COURT FOR PENNA. and ESTATE OF FRANCES FIELDS RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FIELDS v. MOLLINEAU et al
as 2:2010cv05407
Plaintiff:
LAMAR VINCENT FIELDS
Defendant:
MOLLINEAU, WYNDER, HASLAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
