Cases 41 - 50 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv03089
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
English v. Khan et al
as 1:2013cv02857
Plaintiff:
Roderick English
Defendant:
Fazal Khan, Richard S Johnson, Michelle D Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Nettles et al
as 6:2013cv02460
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
W Nettles, R I Lloyd, R Harwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Harwell et al
as 6:2013cv02212
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
R B Harwell, K F McDonald, H M Herlong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rochester v. Wilson et al
as 6:2013cv02197
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
A Wilson, H B Richardson, R B Harwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
VanHoose v. Parr et al
as 4:2013cv01573
Plaintiff:
Thomas Elbert VanHoose, Sr
Defendant:
Patricia Singleton Parr, Gary Allen Cook, Michael Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rochester v. Nettles et al
as 6:2013cv01407
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
W Nettles, R Carter, J Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Legg v. South Carolina et al
as 4:2013cv00172
Plaintiff:
Ronald L Legg
Defendant:
South Carolina and W Thomas Floyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henry v. Jackson et al
as 5:2013cv00075
Plaintiff:
Tarus Tramaine Henry, Sr
Defendant:
Ofc Jackson, R Bing, Sgt Spakes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00012
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
