Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Hamilton v. Butler et al
as 6:2010cv01867
Petitioner:
Donnie Hamilton
Respondent:
Freddie Butler and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Cummings et al
as 2:2010cv00583
Plaintiff:
Shirley Faye Miller
Defendant:
John Cummings , Freddie Butler , Correctional Medical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guyton v. Butler et al
as 6:2010cv01488
Petitioner:
Dennis Guyton
Respondent:
Freddie Butler and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rickman v. Butler et al
as 6:2010cv01356
Petitioner:
Shane Alan Rickman
Respondent:
Freddie Butler and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mitchell v. McCracken et al
as 6:2010cv01316
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Mitchell
Defendant:
Joy McCracken, Gregory Naydin, Freddie Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Allen et al
as 6:2010cv01103
Plaintiff:
Arthur Long
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Freddie Butler, Lillie A Williford and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evatt v. Allen et al
as 6:2010cv00947
Plaintiff:
Amos Charles Evatt
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Jimmy Rhodes, Nathaniel Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. Butler et al
as 6:2010cv00946
Plaintiff:
Howard Singleton
Defendant:
Freddie Butler, Gregory Nayden and Joy McKracken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maddox v. Nayden et al
as 6:2009cv02114
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Rory Maddox
Defendant:
Greg Nayden, Amy Mashburn, Joy McCracken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heulett v. Butler et al
as 5:2009cv01757
Petitioner:
Anthony Heulett
Respondent:
Freddie Butler and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
