Cases 41 - 50 of 86
Irby v. Superintendent
as 3:2015cv00086
Petitioner:
Freeman Irby
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FREEMAN v. LARIVA
as 2:2014cv00393
Petitioner:
JAMES FREEMAN
Respondent:
LEANN LARIVA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FREEMAN v. ZATECKY
as 1:2014cv01970
Petitioner:
GALEN FREEMAN
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FREEMAN v. ZATECKY
as 1:2014cv01859
Petitioner:
GALEN FREEMAN
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FREEMAN v. ZATECKY
as 1:2014cv01757
Petitioner:
GALEN FREEMAN
Respondent:
ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Indiana Department of Corrections Commissioner et al
as 3:2014cv01989
Plaintiff:
de'Carlos Freeman
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections Commissioner, Bruce Lemmon, Mark Levenhagen and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Indiana Department of Corrections Commissioner et al
as 3:2014cv01987
Plaintiff:
de'Carlos Freeman
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections Commissioner, M Rizner, C McKinney and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN v. BURDINE
as 1:2014cv01236
Defendant:
BURDINE
Plaintiff:
GALEN FREEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2014cv01047
Defendant:
BRAD FREEMAN and INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Plaintiff:
GARY MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAGHON v. STORMS et al
as 2:2014cv00192
Defendant:
BUTTS, COLLINS, L. FREEMAN and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN TAGHON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
