Cases 41 - 50 of 1,122
Fields v. Gates et al
as 3:2023cv01412
Plaintiff:
Marcus Brent Fields
Defendant:
S. Gates, Healthcare Correspondence and Appeals Branch, Policy and Risk Management California Correctional Health Care Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Hollows
as 2:2023cv01370
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Gregory G Hollows
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Van Huisen v. NASA
as 2:2023cv01339
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Van Huisen
Defendant:
NASA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Huisen v. County of Alameda
as 4:2023cv03255
Petitioner:
Gregory Scott Van Huisen
Respondent:
County of Alameda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Felder v. Ahern
as 4:2023cv03201
Petitioner:
Marcus Dieter Felder
Respondent:
Gregory J. Ahern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC)Givens v. Trate
as 1:2023cv00954
Petitioner:
Gregory Latrell Givens
Respondent:
B. M. Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Van Huisen v. County of Alameda
as 2:2023cv01180
Petitioner:
Gregory Scott Van Huisen
Respondent:
County of Alameda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDowell v. Murphy
as 5:2023cv02971
Plaintiff:
Gregory Cash McDowell
Defendant:
Trevor Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Van Huisen v. DEA et al
as 2:2023cv01116
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Van Huisen
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Agency, Dobewood Derrin, William Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Duclos v. Lynch et al
as 2:2023cv01000
Plaintiff:
McGhee Tony Duclos
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, J. Gregory, T. Cameron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
