Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Pickett v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00091
Plaintiff:
Joe Ranger Pickett
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, James Carlton, Christopher Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
Gordon Vaughn
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Sam Cochran, Noah Price Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. State Of Alabama et al
as 1:2012cv00769
Plaintiff:
Gordon Vaughn
Defendant:
State Of Alabama, Sam Cochran, Noah Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2012cv00724
Plaintiff:
Gordon Vaughn
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Sam Cochran, City of Mobile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Hetzel
as 1:2012cv00361
Petitioner:
Gordon Vincent Clark
Respondent:
Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brunson v. Hetzel et al
as 7:2011cv00186
Petitioner:
Albert Brunson
Respondent:
Gary Hetzel , Gordon and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
White v. Brooks et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00545
Plaintiff:
Quin Mario White
Defendant:
Eleanor Brooks, Officer Payne, Officer Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Allen et al
as 6:2010cv01103
Plaintiff:
Arthur Long
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Freddie Butler, Lillie A Williford and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evatt v. Allen et al
as 6:2010cv00947
Plaintiff:
Amos Charles Evatt
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Jimmy Rhodes, Nathaniel Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. King et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00101
Plaintiff:
George Hoey Morris
Defendant:
Troy King, Alan Nummy, Thomas Coram, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
