Cases 41 - 50 of 475
McMillian v. Graham et al
as 1:2018cv07183
Defendant:
Correction Officer and Superintendent Harold Graham
Plaintiff:
Herman Carlee McMillian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2018cv01312
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Harold Graham, Anthony J. Annucci and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick M. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Ridge et al
as 1:2018cv09493
Defendant:
Mr. Peter T. Ridge, Mr. Micheal T. Ridge, Tamiko Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Carlington Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cameron-Graham v. City Of New York , et al
as 1:2018cv08906
Defendant:
Supervisor C.O. John/Jane Doe # 1-2, Warden John/Jane Doe # 1, C.O. John/Jane Does #1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Cindra Cameron-Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hong v. Aigle et al
as 1:2018cv08110
Plaintiff:
Brandon Hong
Defendant:
C.O. Aigle and Security Captain Graham
Interested Party:
CITY OF NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2018cv08889
Defendant:
The Chief Administrator, Arresting Officer 887282, Arresting Officer 674007 and others
Plaintiff:
Echo Westley Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Every v. Graham
as 9:2018cv01126
Respondent:
Harold Graham
Petitioner:
Douglas Every
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McFadden v. Graham
as 1:2018cv00865
Defendant:
Harold D. Graham
Petitioner:
Ronel McFadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McClinton v. Graham et al
as 9:2018cv00752
Defendant:
Lara Osika-Michales, Keonigsmann, Rachael Seguin and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. McClinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stuart v. Graham
as 1:2018cv03071
Respondent:
Harold Graham
Petitioner:
Dane Stuart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
