Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Gruff v. Wilson et al
as 3:2007cv01065
Petitioner:
John Anthony Gruff
Respondent:
Harry E. Wilson and The Attorney General Of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez v. Wilson et al
as 1:2007cv00938
Petitioner:
Manuel Lopez
Respondent:
Harry E. Wilson and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHEELER v. WILSON
as 2:2007cv00616
Petitioner:
MACARTHUR WHEELER
Respondent:
HARRY E. WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GOGGINS v. WILSON et al
as 2:2007cv01727
Petitioner:
KHALIL GOGGINS
Respondent:
HARRY E. WILSON, TOM CORBETT and ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DORSEY v. WILSON et al
as 2:2007cv00509
Petitioner:
JAMES EARL DORSEY
Respondent:
HARRY E. WILSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THORPE v. WILSON et al
as 2:2006cv00712
Petitioner:
KEVIN W. THORPE
Respondent:
HARRY E. WILSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUMAS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2007cv00142
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. DUMAS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, HARRY E. WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DELANCEY v. WILSON et al
as 2:2007cv00093
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DOMINIC DELANCEY
Defendant:
HARRY E. WILSON, DANIEL P. BURNS, EDWARD MANCHAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
