Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Schmidt v. Willoughby et al
as 1:2016cv00160
Plaintiff:
Justin L. Schmidt
Defendant:
Robert Willoughby , John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Cassady et al
as 2:2015cv04199
Plaintiff:
Vincent X Lee
Defendant:
Jay Cassady, Bill Armontrout, Donald Wyrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oblinger v. Sigman et al
as 6:2015cv03260
Plaintiff:
David Elmer Oblinger
Defendant:
James Sigman, Glenda Campbell, Tom Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Esposito v. Nixon et al
as 2:2015cv04073
Plaintiff:
Vincent J Esposito
Defendant:
Jay Nixon, George Lombardi, Jason Kander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cates v. Christian County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2015cv03105
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Cates
Defendant:
Six, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nevels v. Jackson County Missouri et al
as 4:2014cv00689
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Nevels
Defendant:
Jackson County Missouri, Kenneth Conlee, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stine v. US Marshal Justice Prisoner Air Transport Division et al
as 6:2014cv03351
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
US Marshal Justice Prisoner Air Transport Division, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wright v. Holder et al
as 2:2013cv04286
Plaintiff:
Sean T Wright
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Mike Oliver, Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paige v. Murry et al
as 1:2012cv00040
Plaintiff:
Lacey Kurt Paige
Defendant:
Unknown Murry , Unknown Taber , Unknown Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankins v. Illinois, State of et al
as 1:2012cv00023
Plaintiff:
Timothy Rankins
Defendant:
Illinois, State of, Elgin Police Department, Ogle County Courthouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
