Cases 41 - 50 of 107
Grayling v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00111
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Jane Doe 1, Sgt Lawrence and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Grayling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. McBriar et al
as 1:2018cv04426
Plaintiff:
Marcus Cook
Defendant:
Ms. Ash, John Does 1-9 and Mr. McBriar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morales-Vega v. Walker et al
as 1:2018cv04013
Defendant:
Ms. Kirkland, Ms. Gembler, Ms. Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Morales-Vega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Humphrey et al
as 4:2018cv00181
Defendant:
FNU McGaba, FNU Harvey, Timothy Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Karl C. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Lykes et al
as 1:2018cv02462
Plaintiff:
Jose Guerrero Garcia
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morales-Vega v. Walker et al
as 3:2018cv00031
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Morales-Vega
Defendant:
Ms. Walker, Ms. Kirkland, Rico Stuckey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jemme J. Jenkins, Individually, and Administrator of the Estate of Jimmie Lee Alexander, Sr. v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00099
Plaintiff:
Jemme J. Jenkins and Julianne Glisson
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc. , Guy Augustin , Victoria Neilser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Bobbitt et al
as 6:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
Earnest Clayton
Defendant:
Trezonza Bobbitt, Harold Caravillio, Harold Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Allen et al
as 6:2018cv00005
Plaintiff:
Earnest Barnard Clayton
Defendant:
Marty C. Allen, Trezonza Bobbitt, Robert Tooles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. Gwinnett County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2017cv05513
Plaintiff:
Darrell Costello Hale
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Sheriff Office, R.L. (Butch) Conway and John Doe 1 & 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
