Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Simmons v. Dodson et al
as 1:2014cv00167
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Simmons
Defendant:
Danny Dodson, James A. Atchison, Thomas Greenwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Dodson
as 1:2013cv00138
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Simmons
Defendant:
Danny Dodson, Josh Bost, Jerry Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Lehman et al
as 2:2013cv04082
Plaintiff:
Sedrick L. Lewis, Sr.
Defendant:
Josh Lehman, Tiffany White and Alexandria Leiva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrington v. Taney County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2013cv03018
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Herrington
Defendant:
Taney County Sheriff's Department, State of Missouri, Missouri Public Defender System and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Pemiscot County Justice Center et al
as 1:2012cv00133
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Simmons
Defendant:
Pemiscot County Justice Center, Danny Dodson, Josh Boss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shing-Hon v. Anderson et al
as 4:2012cv00185
Plaintiff:
Christopher A Shing-Hon
Defendant:
Jeff Anderson, Sean Murray, Christopher Osterberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCrary v. Stange et al
as 1:2011cv00044
Plaintiff:
Jerry McCrary
Defendant:
A. W. Stange, Brannon Gibson, Josh Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCrary v. Doe et al
as 1:2011cv00018
Plaintiff:
Jerry McCrary
Defendant:
Josh Doe, Steve Julian, Southeast Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shing-Hon v. Murray et al
as 4:2010cv00149
Plaintiff:
Christopher A Shing-Hon
Defendant:
Sean Murray, Christopher Osterberg, Jeff Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibson v. Cook et al
as 1:2009cv00176
Plaintiff:
Travis W. Gibson
Defendant:
Rick Cook, Jeff Mitchell, Josh Benton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
