Cases 41 - 50 of 167
SCHLEMMER v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 2:2015cv01583
Petitioner:
LAUREL MICHELE SCHLEMMER
Respondent:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ORLANDO HARPER, KATHLEEN KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Kane et al
as 3:2015cv02175
Petitioner:
Reginald C. Scott
Respondent:
Kathleen Kane and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2015cv01449
Petitioner:
LAVON CECIL SMITH
Respondent:
MARK CAPOZZA and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRIGHTWELL v COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA (ET.AL.)
as 1:2015cv00263
Petitioner:
BOBBY BRIGHTWELL
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLANIA, (ET.AL.), PENNSYLVANIA PROBATION AND PAROLE, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PARKER v. TRITT et al
as 2:2015cv05487
Petitioner:
JASON PARKER
Respondent:
BRENDA TRITT and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BURKHARDT v. KERESTES et al
as 5:2015cv05497
Petitioner:
GEORGE W. BURKHARDT
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES, CRAIG W. STEDMAN and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BUYNA v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2015cv01283
Petitioner:
ALLAN D. BUYNA
Respondent:
MICHAEL OVERMYER, STEPHEN ZAPALLA and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WOOD v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2015cv01284
Petitioner:
KEITH WOOD
Respondent:
MIKE WENEROWICZ , KNOTTS , THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF KATHLEEN KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PRISONERS UNITED TOGETHER ETAL et al v. WOLF
as 2:2015cv05431
Defendant:
TOM WOLF, KATHLEEN KANE, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
JOEZIEL VAZQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pedro v. Kane et al
as 4:2015cv01892
Petitioner:
Crespo Pedro
Respondent:
Kathleen Kane, PA Attorney General and Mooney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
