Cases 41 - 50 of 734
Jordan v. King et al
as 1:2020cv00318
Plaintiff:
Jerett Jordan
Defendant:
James Fillyaw, John Doe and Ron King
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amerson v. King et al
as 3:2020cv00665
Plaintiff:
Lee Tommie Amerson
Defendant:
Captain Unknown McKee, Wendell Banks, Deputy Warden James Fillyaw and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meetze v. CMCF Medical Dept. et al
as 4:2020cv00181
Defendant:
L. Sutton, Warden Miller, J. Farmer and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Wilmoth Meetze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ewing v. King et al
as 3:2020cv00664
Defendant:
Ronald King, Burl Cain and Warden Miller
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Ewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amerson v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2020cv00564
Plaintiff:
Lee Tommie Amerson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
State of Mississippi and Ronald King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walker v. Robinson et al
as 1:2020cv00280
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Demario Walker
Defendant:
Buffie Unknown, John Cooskey, Rita Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamison v. King
as 3:2020cv00552
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Andrew Jamison
Respondent:
Ron King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. King
as 3:2020cv00567
Defendant:
Ronald King
Plaintiff:
Dillion Williams
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Banks v. King et al
as 3:2020cv00482
Defendant:
Mr. Fillepip, Mrs. Michelle Jackson, Officer McKinnel and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Banks
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. King et al
as 3:2020cv00406
Plaintiff:
Stafford L. Chambers and Stafford L. Monroe
Defendant:
Mr. Unknown Philiot, James Millers, Ronald King and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
