Cases 41 - 50 of 389
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv03934
Plaintiff:
MAURICE LEWIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HARRIS et al v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2022cv03715
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARRIS, YAFEST OLIVER, CRAIG JACKSON and others
Defendant:
SECRETARY GEORGE LITTLE, FORMER SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, FORMER SECRETARY JEFFREY BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Bradley
as 1:2022cv01189
Petitioner:
Kevin Lewis
Respondent:
Charles Maiorana and Warden Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LEWIS v. DOE et al
as 2:2022cv02891
Plaintiff:
ANDRE LEWIS
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and MS. STICKNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. WALKER et al
as 2:2022cv00904
Plaintiff:
SHAKOUR A. BROWN
Defendant:
CAPTAIN WALKER, CHAPLAIN LEWIS, C.O. 1 COSTELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RANSOME v. LONGSTRETH et al
as 2:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH RANSOME
Defendant:
STEVEN LONGSTRETH, MS. SHETKA, T. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LEWIS v. ENGLISH
as 2:2022cv00272
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Defendant:
N. C. ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADLEY v. SAYRE et al
as 2:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
GREGORY LEWIS BRADLEY, JR.
Defendant:
HERMAN AVERY SAYRE, JOHN ARMOUR and WILLIAM SHOUPPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
YELVERTON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv01727
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER C. YELVERTON
Defendant:
SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN, DEPUTY STEPHAN BUZAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RIECO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01705
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, C/O 1 J.E. LEWIS, C/O 1 PAVLIC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
