Cases 41 - 50 of 733
Jose Luis Ayala v. Warren L. Montgomery
as 2:2022cv06206
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Ayala
Defendant:
Warden Warren L. Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LaMotte v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2022cv01297
Plaintiff:
James D. LaMotte
Defendant:
County of San Diego, Anthony C. Ray, Jon M. Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Chappell v. McDowell et al
as 3:2022cv01241
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Chappell
Defendant:
N. McDowell, S. Lopez, N. Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Navarro v. Montgomery
as 3:2022cv01093
Petitioner:
Juan Ramon Navarro
Respondent:
W.L. Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Payton v. Montgomery
as 2:2022cv01177
Plaintiff:
Norbert M. Payton and Norbert Maurice Payton
Defendant:
Correctional Officer and Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Montgomery v. Culum et al
as 2:2022cv01156
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Steven Montgomery
Defendant:
M. Culum, J. Gamez, M. Pesce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Montgomery v. Culum et al
as 1:2022cv00802
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Steven Montgomery
Defendant:
M. Culum, J. Gamez, M. Pesce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Earl Washington Jr. v. WL Montgomery
as 5:2022cv01052
Petitioner:
Earl Washington Jr. and Earl Washington, Jr.
Respondent:
WL Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maurice Lavelle Walker Jr. v. Warren Montgomery
as 2:2022cv04406
Petitioner:
Maurice Lavelle Walker, Jr
Respondent:
Warren Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Price v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2022cv00912
Petitioner:
Marcel D. Price
Respondent:
Warren L. Montgomery and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
