Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Gillis v. Raemisch et al
as 3:2009cv00245
Plaintiff:
Nathan Gillis, Giovanni Harris, Jeremiah Young and others
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, G. Grams, J. Nickles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowers v. Nickel et al
as 3:2009cv00194
Plaintiff:
David Elijah Bowers, Jr
Defendant:
Janel Nickel, CAPTAIN RADTKE, Lt. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bowers v. Nickel et al
as 1:2009cv00276
Plaintiff:
David Elijah Bowers, Jr
Defendant:
Janel Nickel, Captain Radkt, L.T. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reid v. Marshall E Sherrer Correctional Center
as 2:2008cv00917
Petitioner:
Jordan H Reid, Jr
Respondent:
Marshall E Sherrer Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marshall v. Suttie et al
as 3:2008cv00485
Plaintiff:
Roger F. Marshall
Defendant:
Kathleen Suttie, Mark Hiese, MATTHEW FRANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. SALTER et al
as 3:2007cv00715
Plaintiff:
MARK D. MARSHALL
Defendant:
SEAN SALTER, BURT TAMMINGA and GREG GRAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Krzoska et al
as 2:2007cv00960
Plaintiff:
David John Marshall
Defendant:
Matthew Krzoska and Chad Melby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Bielke et al
as 3:2007cv00594
Petitioner:
Bradley Alan Jones
Defendant:
Judy Bielke, Melanie Mclaughlin, Guard Bescup and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL, MARK D. v. KINGSTON, PHIL
as 3:2007cv00173
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Marshall
Defendant:
GARY ANKATLO , JEFFREY GARBELMAN , DEBERAH FISCHER and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
MARSHALL, MARK D. v. NICKEL, JANEL
as 3:2006cv00617
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Marshall
Defendant:
Janel Nickel , LT. LIPINSKI, DANA DIEDRICH and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
